Affiliation:
1. Department for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
2. Deutsches Endoprothesenregister (EPRD) gGmbH, 10623 Berlin, Germany
3. Orthopädisch Chirurgisches Kompetenzzentrum Augsburg (OCKA), 86152 Augsburg, Germany
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options. Methods: On the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: In total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%–THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (p = 0.34). A infection rate of 1.1% after HA with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement was reported, compared to a 2.1% infection rate whilst using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after five years (p = 0.098). The number required for treatment when using HA was 91. Conclusions: The use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,Biochemistry,Microbiology
Reference30 articles.
1. World-Wide Projections for Hip Fracture;Gullberg;Osteoporos. Int.,1997
2. Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients with Hip Fracture;Okike;JAMA,2020
3. Nationwide Analysis of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Receding Tide;Ju;J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.,2017
4. Szymski, D., Walter, N., Lang, S., Baertl, S., Weber, J., Alt, V., and Rupp, M. (2022). Incidence and Treatment of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures in Germany. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., Online ahead of print.
5. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2018). American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2018, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献