Foodborne Pathogen Dynamics in Meat and Meat Analogues Analysed Using Traditional Microbiology and Metagenomic Sequencing
-
Published:2023-12-21
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:16
-
ISSN:2079-6382
-
Container-title:Antibiotics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Antibiotics
Author:
Bonaldo Francesco12ORCID, Avot Baptiste Jacques Philippe3, De Cesare Alessandra2, Aarestrup Frank M.3ORCID, Otani Saria3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy 2. Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, Italy 3. Research Group for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
Abstract
Meat analogues play an increasing role in meeting global nutritional needs. However, while it is well known that meat possesses inherent characteristics that create favourable conditions for the growth of various pathogenic bacteria, much less is known about meat analogues. This study aimed to compare the growth and survival of Escherichia coli HEHA16, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica Typhi, Cronobacter sakazakii, and a cocktail of these bacteria in sterile juices from minced chicken, pig, and beef, as well as pea-based and soy-based minced meat. Traditional microbiology and next-generation sequencing of those metagenomes were employed to analyse the pathogen variability, abundance, and survival after an incubation period. Our findings show that all the meat juices provided favourable conditions for the growth and proliferation of the studied bacteria, with the exception of E. coli HEHA16, which showed lower survival rates in the chicken matrix. Meat analogue juice mainly supported L. monocytogenes survival, with C. sakazakii survival supported to a lesser extent. A correlation was observed between the traditional culturing and metagenomic analysis results, suggesting that further work is needed to compare these technologies in foodborne setups. Our results indicate that plant-based meats could serve as vectors for the transmission of certain, but likely not all, foodborne pathogens, using two accurate detection methods. This warrants the need for additional research to better understand and characterise their safety implications, including their potential association with additional pathogens.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,Biochemistry,Microbiology
Reference32 articles.
1. WHO (2023, November 27). Steps up Action to Improve Food Safety and Protect People from Disease. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/07-06-2021-who-steps-up-action-to-improve-food-safety-and-protect-people-from-disease. 2. Research on the drug resistance mechanism of foodborne pathogens;Ge;Microb. Pathog.,2022 3. Elbehiry, A., Abalkhail, A., Marzouk, E., Elmanssury, A.E., Almuzaini, A.M., Alfheeaid, H., Alshahrani, M.T., Huraysh, N., Ibrahem, M., and Alzaben, F. (2023). An Overview of the Public Health Challenges in Diagnosing and Controlling Human Foodborne Pathogens. Vaccines, 11. 4. Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: Current state-of-art and future prospects;Foddai;Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,2020 5. Cronobacter sakazakii in infant food contamination and its survival strategies in hostile conditions;Abebe;Int. J. Pediatr. Res.,2020
|
|