First Experience in the Control of the Venous Side of the Brain AVM

Abstract

Background and purpose: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are increasingly curable with endovascular embolization. This study examines the preliminary experience with a novel double-sided hybrid approach in the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) versus a purely single-sided intra-arterial approach. Materials and methods: The single-center study cohort included 18 patients with brain AVMs (Spetzler–Martin Grade 2 or 3) having stand-alone endovascular treatment with either the arterial-side-only pressure cooker technique (aPCT) (group 1; n = 9) or a double-sided hybrid intra-arterial and transvenous approach (HIPRENE) (group 2; n = 9). Results: Patients belonging to group 2 had lower rates of intra-procedural hemorrhaging (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.169) and needed fewer treatment sessions to achieve nidus occlusion (1.7 vs. 1.2, p = 0.136). The HIPRENE treatment regime led to higher nidus occlusion rates after the initial treatment compared to aPCT (77.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.167). Group 2 patients had a lower rate of neuromonitoring events (22.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.310) and fewer accounts of blood flow obstruction in post-operative MRIs (33.3% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.319). Conclusion: A double-sided hybrid intra-arterial and transvenous approach might have benefits for curative endovascular brain AVM treatment in patients with Spetzler–Martin Grade 2 or 3. In our small study cohort, the HIPRENE treatment regime had higher nidus occlusion rates after the first treatment, which reduces the number of treatment sessions and lowers intra- and post-operative complication rates. Further randomized controlled studies are awaited to corroborate our preliminary outcomes.