Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs. Observation in Thin Melanoma: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Study

Author:

Tejera-Vaquerizo Antonio,Boada AramORCID,Ribero Simone,Puig SusanaORCID,Paradela Sabela,Moreno-Ramírez David,Cañueto Javier,de Unamuno-Bustos Blanca,Brinca Ana,Descalzo-Gallego Miguel A.,Osella-Abate SimonaORCID,Cassoni PaolaORCID,Podlipnik SebastianORCID,Carrera CristinaORCID,Vidal-Sicart SergiORCID,Pigem Ramón,Toll Agustí,Rull Ramón,Alos LlucìaORCID,Requena Celia,Bolumar Isidro,Traves Víctor,Pla Ángel,Fernández-Orland Almudena,Jaka AneORCID,Fernández-Figueras María TeresaORCID,Richarz Nina AnikaORCID,Vieira Ricardo,Botella-Estrada Rafael,Román-Curto Concepción,Ferrándiz-Pulido Lara,Iglesias-Pena NicolásORCID,Ferrándiz CarlosORCID,Malvehy Josep,Quaglino Pietro,Nagore EduardoORCID

Abstract

The therapeutic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in thin melanoma remains controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the role of SLNB in the survival of thin melanomas (≤1 mm). A multicenter retrospective observational study was designed. A propensity score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent SLNB vs. observation. A multivariate Cox regression was used. A total of 1438 patients were matched by propensity score. There were no significant differences in melanoma-specific survival (MSS) between the SLNB and observation groups. Predictors of MSS in the multivariate model were age, tumor thickness, ulceration, and interferon treatment. Results were similar for disease-free survival and overall survival. The 5- and 10-year MSS rates for SLN-negative and -positive patients were 98.5% vs. 77.3% (p < 0.001) and 97.3% vs. 68.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. SLNB does not improve MSS in patients with thin melanoma. It also had no impact on DSF or OS. However, a considerable difference in MSS, DFS, and OS between SLN-positive and -negative patients exists, confirming its value as a prognostic procedure and therefore we recommend discussing the option of SLNB with patients.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3