Affiliation:
1. Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Inflammation, being a typical response to vascular tissue alterations, induces variations in tissue oxygen diffusion pressure. Diabetic microangiopathy, an inflammatory process, is characterized by an increase in vascular flow at rest, reduced venous and arteriolar responses, and increased capillary permeability, resulting in oedema development, decreased transcutaneous oxygen pressure, and increased transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure. This phenomenon potentially hampers ulcer healing. Although the figure-of-eight method has proven to be a reliable, valid, quick, and efficient test for assessing foot and ankle measurements in patients with oedema and compromised skin integrity, it has not been studied in patients with diabetic foot. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the intra- and inter-observer variabilities of the figure-of-eight method in patients with diabetic foot. A prospective observational and cross-sectional study was undertaken, involving sixty-one subjects from a specialized Diabetic Foot Unit. Three investigators with varying levels of experience independently measured the subjects to assess both intra-observer and inter-observer variability. The evaluation was conducted using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). In the statistical analysis, an ICC of 0.93, adjusted using a 95% confidence interval (CI), was obtained for inter-observer reliability ICC, indicating excellent reliability among observers. Furthermore, an ICC of 0.98 with a 95% CI was obtained for the intra-observer reliability analysis, indicating excellent reliability. The results support using this test during the clinical management of oedema in patients with diabetic foot. The absence of an objective, fast, and readily available diagnostic method for oedema in diabetic foot patients in clinical practice might pose a limitation. Subsequent research should tackle this issue and explore the correlation between ankle perimeter measurements and other clinical outcomes in diabetic foot patients, including wound healing and quality of life.