Affiliation:
1. Department of Art History, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
Tchaikovsky enjoyed composing Yevgeni Onegin. He expressed his fulfillment in a famous letter to Sergey Taneyev. What could his enthusiasm convey about the content of the project? Music criticism has taken Tchaikovsky’s words as proof for the thesis that the opera is connected to autobiographical circumstances. In this mode of thinking, the quality of Tchaikovsky’s music is the result of the composer’s identification with the subject matter. Despite the objection of several Tchaikovsky scholars, the autobiographical paradigm remains very much alive in the reception of Tchaikovsky’s music. As an alternative, Tchaikovsky scholarship has explored a hermeneutical approach that would link his music to its context in Russian society and culture. In this paper, I present another possible reaction to Tchaikovsky’s statement: an exploration of the composer’s approach to musical characterization. Analysis of some key scenes reveals that the definition of characters and situations by musical means is more precise than standard interpretations of the opera would concede. This discovery may lead to a new assessment of characterization as a critical tool to refine the definition of Tchaikovsky’s position in European music history. The method may be applied to examples outside his operatic output, such as Serenade for Strings and the Fifth Symphony.
Reference24 articles.
1. Music—Drastic or Gnostic?;Abbate;Critical Inquiry,2004
2. Adorno, Theodor W. (1963). Quasi una Fantasia. Musikalische Schriften 2, Suhrkamp Verlag.
3. Adorno, Theodor W. (1968). Einleitung in die Musiksoziologie. Zwölf theoretische Vorlesungen, Rowohlt.
4. Allanbrook, Wye Jamison (1983). Rhytmic Gesture in Mozart: Le Nozze di Figaro & Don Giovanni, University of Chicago Press.
5. Allanbrook, Wye Jamison (2014). The Secular Commedia: Comic Mimesis in Late Eighteenth-Century Music, University of California Press.