Abstract
Both the public and clinicians are interested in the application of scientific knowledge concerning problem animal behaviour and its treatment. However, in order to do this effectively it is essential that individuals have not only scientific literacy but also an appreciation of philosophical concepts underpinning a particular approach and their practical implications on the knowledge generated as a result. This paper highlights several common misunderstandings and biases associated with different scientific perspectives relevant to clinical animal behaviour and their consequences for how we determine what may be a useful treatment for a given patient. In addition to more reflective evaluation of results, there is a need for researchers to report more information of value to clinicians; such as relevant treatment outcomes, effect sizes, population characteristics. Clinicians must also appreciate the limitations of population level study results to a given case. These challenges can however be overcome with the careful critical reflection using the scientific principles and caveats described.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference118 articles.
1. Animal clinical psychology: A modest proposal;Tuber;Am. Psychol.,1974
2. A history of animal welfare science;Broom;Acta Biotheor.,2011
3. Spain, C.V., Freund, D., Mohan-Gibbons, H., Meadow, R.G., and Beacham, L. Are they buying it? United States consumers’ changing attitudes toward more humanely raised meat, eggs, and dairy. Animals, 2018. 8.
4. Sandøe, P., Corr, S., and Palmer, C. Companion Animal Ethics, 2015.
5. Efficacy of dog training with and without remote electronic collars vs. a focus on positive reinforcement;China;Front. Vet. Sci.,2020
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献