Quantification and Pictorial Expression of Driving Status Domain Boundaries for Autonomous Vehicles in LTAP/OD Scenarios

Author:

Ren Xuan1,Zhang Huanhuan1,Wang Xiaolan1,Zhang Weiwei2,Yu Wangpengfei2

Affiliation:

1. School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China

2. Shanghai Smart Vehicle Cooperating Innovation Center Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201805, China

Abstract

The ability of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles to make human-like decisions can be enhanced by providing more detailed information about vehicles and in-vehicle users’ states. In this paper, the driving status domains of vehicles in left turn across path/opposite direction (LTAP/OD) scenarios are subdivided into comfort, discomfort, extreme, and crash, and the boundaries of each status domain are quantified and visualized. First, real unprotected left turn road segments are chosen for the actual vehicle testing. Subjective passenger comfort evaluation results and objective motion state data of vehicles during the experiment are organized and analyzed by statistics. In addition, the pictorials are plotted to determine the comfort and extreme status domain boundaries based on motion state parameters. Second, based on the unprotected left turn kinematic analysis and modeling, as well as a skilled driver risk perception and operational model, the Safe Collision Plots (SCP) of conflicting vehicles in LTAP/OD scenarios are quantified and expressed as pictorial examples. By combining objective motion parameters and passenger experience, intuitively quantifying each driving status domain of vehicles can provide more fine-grained information for the design parameters of ADAS and autonomous vehicles and increase public trust and acceptance of them.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Reference20 articles.

1. Campbell, J.L., Richard, C.M., Brown, J.L., and McCallum, M. (2007). Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned, NHTSA. Technical Report DOT HS 810 697.

2. Driver behavior and situation aware brake assistance for intelligent vehicles;McCall;Proc. IEEE,2007

3. Sullivan, J., Tsimhoni, O., and Bogard, S. (2007). Warning Reliability and Driving Performance in Naturalistic Driving, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

4. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction;Hancock;Hum. Factors,2011

5. Nodine, E., Lam, A., Stevens, S., Razo, M., and Najm, W. (2011). Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) Light Vehicle Field Operational Test Independent Evaluation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3