Assessing the Viability of Integrating Evaporation and Solvent Extraction Systems for Lithium Recovery from Low-Grade Brines
-
Published:2024-07-11
Issue:7
Volume:12
Page:1453
-
ISSN:2227-9717
-
Container-title:Processes
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Processes
Author:
Ochromowicz Katarzyna1ORCID, Zabłocka-Malicka Monika1ORCID, Chojnacka Ida1ORCID, Worsa-Kozak Magdalena2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Division of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Metallurgy, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland 2. Department of Mining, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland
Abstract
In recent years, the demand for lithium, essential to the high-tech and battery sectors, has increased rapidly. The majority of lithium carbonate is now sourced from continental brines in Latin America, owing to the lower production costs and reduced environmental impact. In Europe, often overlooked but promising lithium resources could include highly mineralized underground waters. Therefore, this study investigates the enrichment of these low-grade solutions (<100 mg/L Li) through evaporation followed by solvent extraction (SX) processes under specific conditions. The effectiveness and the technical feasibility of lithium extraction were evaluated using binary synthetic, multicomponent semi-synthetic, and real brine samples. The popular tributyl phosphate/methyl isobutyl ketone (TBP/MIBK) system, supplemented with FeCl3 and AlCl3 as co-extractants, was employed as the organic phase. Evaporation resulted in significant lithium losses (up to 80%), reduced to ~10% by washing the crystallisate obtained during evaporation with ethanol. The results from SX tests revealed differences between the synthetic and real brines. While the synthetic brines exhibited satisfactory lithium extraction yields (91%), the real brines showed a significantly lower extraction efficiency (~32%), rendering the tested system ineffective. Solid phase precipitation during the SX trials was observed for both the synthetic and real brines, which were concentrated before the SX stage, highlighting the challenges in lithium-recovery processes. However, semi-synthetic brine trials yielded promising results, with a satisfactory extraction efficiency (76%), and the absence of physical problems (emulsion, long disengagement, etc.). This reveals the importance of the chemical composition of brines and emphasizes the need for varied procedural approaches in lithium-recovery processes.
Reference55 articles.
1. Garrett, D.E. (2004). Handbook of Lithium and Natural Calcium Chloride, Elsevier Ltd. 2. European Commission (2020). Study on the EU’s List of Critical Raw Materials, European Commission. 3. Nicolaci, H., Young, P., Snowdon, N., Rai, A., Chen, T., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., Bailey, E., Shi, R., and Zheng, N. (2023). Direct Lithium Extraction: A potential game changing technology. Global Metals & Mining, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 4. Recovery of lithium from leach solutions of battery waste using direct solvent extraction with TBP and FeCl3;Wesselborg;Hydrometallurgy,2021 5. Extraction of lithium from salt lake brine with triisobutyl phosphate in ionic liquid and kerosene;Gao;Chem. Res. Chin. Univ.,2015
|
|