Author:
Cruz Ayala Mary-Belle,Soto José R.,Wilder Margaret O.
Abstract
Analyzing collaborative practices among water governance institutions is key to generating timely information for stakeholders, policymakers, and researchers -as these are rethinking their goals and network structures to find the most productive avenues for collective work. This study draws on existing collaboration theories to characterize and analyze science-policy interactions between researchers, water managers, non-governmental organizations, and consultants who have participated or currently participate in water management and recharge projects in Mexico. We sampled 70 people that had worked or are working on water recharge projects in eight Mexican states in three broad regions: Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, Sonora (northern); Estado de Mexico, San Luis Potosí, Mexico City (central); and Oaxaca (southern). Participants represented research institutions, non-governmental organizations, universities, federal, state, and municipal governments, and consultants. The data were collected using a mixed-methods approach (i.e., semi-structured interviews; online surveys). We identified science-policy interactions between researchers, policymakers, and non-governmental organizations critical to effectively developing and implementing water recharge projects. Our results find that trust and stakeholder participation are the most critical elements for building collaborative relationships. Finding ways to supersede structural challenges and promote science-policy collaboration among sectors and interagency with water management responsibilities will help achieve environmental and policy goals and increase water recharge development across Mexico.
Funder
National Council of Science and Technology in Mexico
the Udall Centre for Studies in Public Policy
the Center for Latin American Studies at the University of Arizona
Carson Scholars University of Arizona
Center for Latin American Studies
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference66 articles.
1. CONAGUA (2022, November 14). Estadísticas del Agua en México [Statistics on Water in Mexico]. Comisión Nacional del Agua, Mexico. Available online: https://sina.conagua.gob.mx/publicaciones/EAM_2018.pdf.
2. Unequal Access to Water and Its Affordability for Households in Mexico;J. Poverty,2021
3. Pahl-Wostl, C., Kabat, P., and Möltgen, J. (2008). Adaptive, and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Complexity and Uncertainty, Springer. [1st ed.].
4. Varady, R., Zuniga-Teran, A.A., Gerlak, A.K., and Megdal, S.B. (2016). Modes and Approaches of Groundwater Governance: A Survey of Lessons Learned from Selected Cases across the Globe. Water, 8.
5. Goodspeed, R., Babbitt, C., Briones, A.L.G., Pfleiderer, E., Lizundia, C., and Seifert, C.M. (2020). Learning to Manage Common Resources: Stakeholders Playing a Serious Game See Increased Interdependence in Groundwater Basin Management. Water, 12.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献