Non-Invasive Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion

Author:

Nakachi TatsuyaORCID,Kato Shingo,Saito Naka,Fukui Kazuki,Iwasawa Tae,Endo Tsutomu,Kosuge Masami,Utsunomiya Daisuke,Kimura Kazuo,Tamura Kouichi

Abstract

Background: As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) gains wider acceptance as a therapeutic option for coronary artery disease, the importance of appropriate patient selection has increased. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows segmental and quantitative analyses of myocardial ischemia and scar transmurality, it has limitations, including contraindications, cost, and accessibility. This study established a non-invasive method to evaluate patients undergoing CTO-PCI using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Methods: Overall, we studied 55 patients who underwent successful CTO-PCI. Cardiovascular MRI and 2D-STE were performed before and 8 ± 2 months after CTO-PCI. Segmental findings of strain parameters were compared with those obtained with late gadolinium enhancement and stress-perfusion MRI. Results: With a cutoff of −10.7, pre-procedural circumferential strain (CS) showed reasonable sensitivity (71%) and specificity (73%) for detecting segments with transmural scar. The discriminatory ability of longitudinal strain (LS) for segments with transmural scar significantly improved during follow-up after successful CTO-PCI in the territory of the recanalized artery (area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001). LS accuracy was lower than that of CS at baseline (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.79, p = 0.048), and was increased at follow-up (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.82, p = 0.81). Changes in myocardial perfusion reserve from baseline to follow-up were significantly associated with those in LS but not in CS. Conclusions: Use of 2D-STE may allow the non-invasive evaluation of patients undergoing CTO-PCI to assess the indication before the procedure and treatment effects at follow-up.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3