Abstract
A conservative approach for restoring deep proximal lesions is to apply an increment of composite resin over the preexisting cervical margin to relocate it coronally, the so-called “deep margin elevation” (DME). A literature search for research articles referring to DME published from January 1998 until November 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Semantic Scholar databases applying preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Elevation material and adhesive system employed for luting seem to be significant factors concerning the marginal adaptation of the restoration. This technique does not affect bond strength, fatigue behavior, fracture resistance, failure pattern or repairability. DME and subgingival restorations are compatible with periodontal health, given that they are well-polished and refined. The available literature is limited mainly to in vitro studies. Therefore, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary to clarify all aspects of the technique and ascertain its validity in clinical practice. For the time being, DME should be applied with caution respecting three criteria: capability of field isolation, the perfect seal of the cervical margin provided by the matrix, and no invasion of the connective compartment of biological width.
Reference114 articles.
1. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: New classification and differen-tiated treatment approach;Veneziani;Eur. J. Esthet. Dent.,2010
2. Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on CAD/CAM-Fabricated Ceramic Inlays
3. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results
4. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure;Hickel;J. Adhes Dent.,2001
5. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study;Barone;Quintessence Int.,2008
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献