Affiliation:
1. Department of History, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences Bldg. 606, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
2. Alberta Medical Foundation/Hannah Professor in the History of Medicine and Health Care, Cumming School of Medicine, Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Abstract
Ludwig Edinger (1855–1918) is often perceived as a functional neuroanatomist who primarily followed traditional lines of microscopic research. That he was a rather fascinating innovator in the history of neurology at the turn from the nineteenth to the twentieth century has, however, gone quite unnoticed. Edinger’s career and his pronounced hopes for future investigative progress in neurological work mark an important shift, one away from traditional research styles connected to department-based approaches towards a multi-perspective and quite advanced form of interdisciplinary scientific work. Being conceptually influenced by the Austrian neuroanatomist Heinrich Obersteiner (1847–1922) and his foundation of the Neurological Institute in Vienna in 1882, Edinger established a multi-faceted brain research program. It was linked to an institutional setting of laboratory analysis and clinical research that paved the way for a new type of interdisciplinarity. After completion of his medical training, which brought him in working relationships with illustrious clinicians such as Friedrich von Recklinghausen (1810–1879) and Adolf Kussmaul (1822–1902), Edinger settled in 1883 as one of the first clinically working neurologists in the German city of Frankfurt/Main. Here, he began to collaborate with the neuropathologist Carl Weigert (1845–1904), who worked at the independent research institute of the Senckenbergische Anatomie. Since 1902, Edinger came to organize the anatomical collections and equipment for a new brain research laboratory in the recently constructed Senckenbergische Pathologie. It was later renamed the “Neurological Institute”, and became an early interdisciplinary working place for the study of the human nervous system in its comparative, morphological, experimental, and clinical dimensions. Even after Edinger’s death and under the austere circumstances of the Weimar Period, altogether three serviceable divisions continued with fruitful research activities in close alignment: the unit of comparative neurology, the unit of neuropsychology and neuropathology (headed by holist neurologist Kurt Goldstein, 1865–1965), and an associated unit of paleoneurology (chaired by Ludwig Edinger’s daughter Tilly, 1897–1967, who later became a pioneering neuropaleontologist at Harvard University). It was especially the close vicinity of the clinic that attracted Edinger’s attention and led him to conceive a successful model of neurological research, joining together different scientific perspectives in a unique and visibly modern form.
Reference102 articles.
1. The Neurosciences Research Program at MIT and the Beginning of the Modern Field of Neuroscience;Adelman;Journal of the History of the Neurosciences,2010
2. Angermann, Matthias C., and Steinberg, Holger (2005). 200 Jahre Psychiatrie an der Universität Leipzig: Personen und Konzepte, DeGruyter.
3. Raininger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R., and Maienschein, Jane (1988). The American Development of Biology, University of Philadelphia Press.
4. From Photography to Cinematography: Recording Movement and Gait in a Neurological Context;Aubert;Journal of the History of the Neurosciences,2010
5. Johann Christian Senckenberg und seine Stiftung;Bauer;Forschung Frankfurt,2006
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献