Abstract
Much has happened since Dipesh Chakrabarty, at the turn of the millennium, paradigmatically called for a “provincialization of Europe”. The paper connects with three major trends in current history of technology, exploring these threads with regards to the Global South in general and post/colonial Africa in particular: (1) exemplifying and (later) disentangling transnational connections; (2) rethinking (colonial) infrastructures; and (3) exploring technologies-in-use, everyday practices and perceptions. Unpacking established Science and Technology concepts such as Thomas P. Hughes “Large (Socio)Technical Systems” (LTS) approach for post/colonial contexts, the paper argues that we need to move beyond the much-invoked “key figures” and drivers of global technological (ex)change and scrutinize place- and time-specific landscapes of technology instead. In particular, we need to pay closer attention to seemingly peripheral actors and actants as well as to the manifold interrelations between the human and the “natural” world.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference272 articles.
1. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference;Chakrabarty,2000
2. Globalgeschichte: Methoden und Theorien;Komlosy,2011
3. https://zeitgeschichte-digital.de/doks/frontdoor/index/index/docId/588
4. Introduction: Africanizing the History of Technology
5. New Natures: Joining Environmental History with Science and Technology Studies,2013
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献