Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Zhu He1,Wen Bei1,Xu Jijun234,Zhang Yuelun5ORCID,Xu Li1,Huang Yuguang1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

2. Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

3. Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

4. Cleveland Clinic, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

5. Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Abstract

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling condition that usually affects the extremities after trauma or surgery. At present, there is no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment for patients with CRPS. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies and determine the best strategy for CRPS. We searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological treatment with placebo in CRPS patients. Target patients were diagnosed with CRPS according to Budapest Criteria in 2012 or the 1994 consensus-based IASP CRPS criteria. Finally, 23 RCTs comprising 1029 patients were included. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty (confidence in evidence and quality of evidence). Direct meta-analysis showed that using bisphosphonates (BPs) (mean difference [MD] −2.21, 95% CI −4.36–−0.06, p = 0.04, moderate certainty) or ketamine (mean difference [MD] −0.78, 95% CI −1.51–−0.05, p = 0.04, low certainty) could provide long-term (beyond one month) pain relief. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of short-term pain relief. Ketamine (rank p = 0.55) and BPs (rank p = 0.61) appeared to be the best strategies for CRPS pain relief. Additionally, BPs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.86, 95% CI 1.34–2.57, p < 0.01, moderate certainty) and ketamine (risk ratio [RR] = 3.45, 95% CI 1.79–6.65, p < 0.01, moderate certainty) caused more adverse events, which were mild, and no special intervention was required. In summary, among pharmacological interventions, ketamine and bisphosphonate injection seemed to be the best treatment for CRPS without severe adverse events.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference54 articles.

1. Complex regional pain syndrome;Bruehl;BMJ,2015

2. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and the Value of Early Detection;Harnik;Curr. Pain Headache Rep.,2023

3. Complex regional pain syndrome and functional nerological disorders—Time for reconciliation;Popkirov;J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,2019

4. Complex Regional Pain Syn drome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 5th Edition;Harden;Pain Med.,2022

5. Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II;Smart;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3