Coverings on Pitfall Traps Influence the Abundance of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods

Author:

Litavský Juraj1ORCID,Prokop Pavol12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B2 418, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia

2. Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia

Abstract

Pitfall traps provide a cost-effective method of studying the diversity and abundance of ground-dwelling arthropods, such as beetles and spiders. Their efficiency depends on factors such as size, shape, and substances used to kill or preserve the specimens. Entomologists often employ covers on pitfall traps to prevent dilution of fixation liquids or keep the traps open. In this study, we investigated whether the presence or absence of covers, as well as their colour (black versus translucent), over pitfall traps has an impact on the species diversity and abundance of carabid beetles and harvestmen. These arthropods serve as common examples of ground-dwelling invertebrates, both in forest and meadow environments. Our findings revealed that traps with black-coloured coverings captured significantly higher numbers of beetles than translucent traps, but the uncovered traps were not significantly different from the two. The species richness tended to be highest in uncovered traps. The uncovered traps were the most efficient in capturing adult harvestmen, followed by translucent and black covers in terms of adult harvestmen abundance and diversity. In conclusion, the use of covers on pitfall traps significantly affects the estimates of arthropod abundance and should be taken into account in future research.

Funder

Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic VEGA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology

Reference54 articles.

1. A review of extensive variation in the design of pitfall traps and a proposal for a standard pitfall trap design for monitoring ground-active arthropod biodiversity;Brown;Ecol. Evol.,2016

2. Pitfall trapping outperforms other methods for surveying ground-dwelling large-bodied alpine invertebrates;Bertoia;J. Insect Conserv.,2023

3. Dahl, F. (1896). Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Lebensweise wirbelloser Aasfresser. Sitz. Ber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin., 17–30.

4. Traps for cave-inhabiting insects;Barber;J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.,1931

5. Pitfall traps: A review of methods for estimating arthropod abundance;Hohbein;Wildl. Soc. Bull.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3