Application of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Cochlear Implant Patients: Implications for the Design of Specific Rehabilitation Programs
Author:
Frosolini AndreaORCID, Badin GiulioORCID, Sorrentino Flavia, Brotto DavideORCID, Pessot Nicholas, Fantin Francesco, Ceschin Federica, Lovato Andrea, Coppola Nicola, Mancuso Antonio, Vedovelli Luca, Marioni GinoORCID, de Filippis Cosimo
Abstract
Introduction: Cochlear implants (CI) have been developed to enable satisfying verbal communication, while music perception has remained in the background in both the research and technological development, thus making CI users dissatisfied by the experience of listening to music. Indications for clinicians to test and train music abilities are at a preliminary stage compared to the existing and well-established hearing and speech rehabilitation programs. The main aim of the present study was to test the utility of the application of two different patient reporting outcome (PRO) measures in a group of CI users. A secondary objective was to identify items capable of driving the indication and design specific music rehabilitation programs for CI patients. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of 73 CI patients referred to the Audiology Unit, University of Padova, was enrolled from November 2021 to May 2022 and evaluated with the audiological battery test and PRO measures: Musica e Qualità della Vita (MUSQUAV) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) Italian version. Results: The reliability analysis showed good consistency between the different PRO measures (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.873). After accounting for the epidemiological and clinical variables, the PRO measures showed a correlation with audiological outcomes in only one case (rho = −0.304; adj. p = 0.039) for NCIQ-T with the CI-pure tone average. A willingness for musical rehabilitation was present in 63% of patients (Rehab Factor, mean value of 0.791 ± 0.675). Conclusions: We support the role of the application of MUSQUAV and NCIQ to improve the clinical and audiological evaluation of CI patients. Moreover, we proposed a derivative item, called the rehab factor, which could be used in clinical practice and future studies to clarify the indication and priority of specific music rehabilitation programs.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference42 articles.
1. Mandalà, M., Mazzocchin, L., Ward, B.K., Viberti, F., Bindi, I., Salerni, L., Colletti, G., Colletti, L., and Colletti, V. A retrospective evaluation to assess reliability of electrophysiological methods for diagnosis of hearing loss in infants. Brain Sci., 2022. 12. 2. Cochlear implantation in adults with auditory deprivation: What do we know about it?;Sorrentino;Am. J. Otolaryngol.,2020 3. Freni, F., Gazia, F., Slavutsky, V., Perello Scherdel, E., Nicenboim, L., Posada, R., Portelli, D., Galletti, B., and Galletti, F. Cochlear implant surgery: Endomeatal approach versus posterior tympanotomy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020. 17. 4. Cochlear implant in the elderly: Results in terms of speech perception and quality of life;Forli;Audiol. Neurotol.,2019 5. Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: A uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors;Favaretto;Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.,2019
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|