Evaluation of AV Deadheading Strategies
-
Published:2024-09-12
Issue:3
Volume:4
Page:1059-1077
-
ISSN:2673-7590
-
Container-title:Future Transportation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Future Transportation
Author:
Mantri Sruthi1, Bergman David2, Lownes Nicholas1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA 2. School of Business, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Abstract
The transition of the vehicle fleet to incorporate AV will be a long and complex process. AVs will gradually form a larger and larger share of the fleet mix, offering opportunities and challenges for improved efficiency and safety. At any given point during this transition a portion of the AV fleet will be consuming roadway capacity while deadheading, which means operating without passengers. Should these unoccupied vehicles simply utilize the shortest paths to their next destination, they will contribute to congestion for the rest of the roadway users without providing any benefit to human passengers. There is an opportunity to develop routing strategies for deadheading AVs that mitigate or eliminate their contribution to congestion while still serving the mobility needs of AV owners or passengers. Some of the AV fleet will be privately owned, while some will be part of a shared AV fleet. In the former, some AVs will be owned by households that are lower-income and benefit from the ability to have fewer vehicles to serve the mobility needs of the household. In these cases, it is especially important that deadheading AVs can meet household mobility needs while also limiting the contribution to roadway congestion. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate routing strategies for deadheading autonomous vehicles (AVs) that balance the reduction of roadway congestion and the mobility needs of households. By proposing and testing a bi-objective program, this study seeks to identify effective methodologies for routing unoccupied AVs in a manner that mitigates their negative impact on traffic while still fulfilling essential transportation requirements of the household. Three strategies are proposed to deploy AV deadheading methodology to route deadheading vehicles on longer paths, reducing congestion for occupied vehicles, while still meeting the trip-making needs of households. Case studies on two transportation networks are presented alongside their practical implications and computational requirements.
Funder
Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education
Reference43 articles.
1. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations;Fagnant;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.,2015 2. Mavromatis, I., Tassi, A., Piechocki, R.J., and Sooriyabandara, M. (2020, January 25–28). On urban traffic flow benefits of connected and automated vehicles. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Federal Highway Administration (2023, May 17). Policy and Strategy Analysis Team, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/policyanalysis.cfm. 4. Gopalakrishna, D., Carlson, P.J., Sweatman, P., Raghunathan, D., Brown, L., and Serulle, N.U. (2021). Impacts of Automated Vehicles on Highway Infrastructure, Federal Highway Administration. 5. The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: A review;Duarte;J. Urban Technol.,2018
|
|