Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Clinical Performances of the Shorter Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Sample of Italian People with Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Author:

Paolucci Teresa1,Pezzi Letizia2ORCID,Coraci Daniele3,Tognolo Lucrezia3ORCID,Pantalone Andrea4ORCID,Attanasi Carmine5,Graziani Giancarlo6,Dalla Costa Davide7ORCID,Arippa Federico8ORCID,Cichelli Alice1,Monticone Marco9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral, Medical and Biotechnological Sciences (DSMOB), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Study “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy

2. Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Cremona-Ospedale di Cremona, Viale Concordia, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy

3. Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy

4. Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, University “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy

5. Santa Caterina Novella Hospital, 73013 Lecce, Italy

6. Dipartimento Specialita’ Mediche, Uoc Medicina Riabilitativa, Asl Roma 1, Borgo Santo Spirito, 3, 00193 Rome, Italy

7. Unit of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, ASST Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy

8. Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09141 Cagliari, Italy

9. Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

Abstract

Background. Evaluating the psychometric and clinical performances of the RM-18, the shorter version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), in Italian people with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) as a time-saving and clinically useful method of assessing disability. Methods. This cross-sectional study included 74 people (52 females and 22 males, 53.03 ± 15.25 years old) with NSLBP. The RM-18, the RMQ, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) were administered. Psychometric testing included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest measurement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1), and concurrent validity by comparing the RM-18 with the RMQ and the ODI (Pearson’s r correlation). Two separate regression analyses were performed to investigate the different impact of RM-18 and RMQ on NRS. Results. Cronbach’s α of RM-18 was 0.92 and ICC (2,1) = 0.96. Strong correlations were found with the RMQ and the ODI (r = 0.98; r = 0.78, respectively). The regression models showed that the RM-18 and the RMQ similarly impacted the NRS (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The RM-18 showed satisfactory psychometric testing and similarly impacted the NRS when compared to the RMQ. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes in Italian people with NSLBP.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3