Comparative Study of Parameter Extraction from a Solar Cell or a Photovoltaic Module by Combining Metaheuristic Algorithms with Different Simulation Current Calculation Methods

Author:

Qin Cheng1,Li Jianing1,Yang Chen1,Ai Bin12ORCID,Zhou Yecheng1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Abstract

In this paper, single-diode model (SDM) and double-diode model (DDM) parameters of the French RTC solar cell and the Photowatt PWP 201 photovoltaic (PV) module were extracted by combining five metaheuristic algorithms with three simulation current calculation methods (i.e., approximation method, Lambert W method and Newton–Raphson method), respectively. It was found that the parameter-extraction accuracies of the Lambert W (LW) method and the Newton–Raphson (NR) method are always approximately equal and higher than that of the approximation method. The best RMSEs (root mean square error) obtained by using the LW or the NR method on the solar cell and the PV module are 7.72986 × 10−4 and 2.05296 × 10−3 for SDM parameter extraction and 6.93709 × 10−4 and 1.99051 × 10−3 for DDM parameter extraction, respectively. The latter may be the highest parameter-extraction accuracy reported on the solar cell and the PV module so far, which is due to the adoption of more reasonable DDM parameter boundaries. Furthermore, the convergence curves of the LW and the NR method basically coincide, with a convergence speed faster than that of the approximation method. The robustness of a parameter-extraction method is mainly determined by the metaheuristic algorithm, but it is also affected by the simulation current calculation method and the parameter-extraction object. In a word, the approximation method is not suitable for application in PV-model parameter extraction because of incorrect estimation of the simulation current and the RMSE, while the LW and NR methods are suitable for the application for accurately calculating the simulation current and RMSE. In terms of saving computation resources and time, the NR method is superior to the LW method.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3