Statistical Assessment of Some Interpolation Methods for Building Grid Format Digital Bathymetric Models

Author:

Amoroso Pier Paolo1,Aguilar Fernando J.2ORCID,Parente Claudio1ORCID,Aguilar Manuel A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. International PhD Programme “Environment, Resources and Sustainable Development”, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy

2. Department of Engineering and Research Centre CIAIMBITAL, University of Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain

Abstract

As far as the knowledge of the seabed is concerned, both for safe navigation and for scientific research, 3D models, particularly digital bathymetric models (DBMs), are nowadays of fundamental importance. This work aimed to evaluate the quality of DBMs according to the interpolation methods applied to obtain grid format 3D surfaces from scattered sample points. Other complementary factors affecting DBM vertical accuracy, such as seabed morphological complexity and surveyed points sampling density, were also analyzed by using a factorial ANOVA experimental design. The experiments were performed on a multibeam dataset provided by the Italian Navy Hydrographic Institute (IIM) with an original resolution of 1 m × 1 m grid spacing, covering a surface of 0.24 km2. Six different sectors comprising different seabed morphologies were investigated. Eight sampling densities were randomly extracted from every sector, each with four repetitions. Finally, four different interpolation methods were tested, including: radial basis multiquadric function (RBMF), ordinary kriging (OK), universal kriging (UK) and Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRF). The results demonstrated that both RBMF and OK produced very accurate DBM in areas characterized by low levels of seabed ruggedness at sampling densities of only 0.0128 points/m2 (equivalent grid spacing of 8.84 m). In contrast, a higher density of 0.1024 points/m2 (3.13 m grid spacing) was required to produce accurate DBM in areas with more complex seabed topography. On the other hand, UK and GMRF were strongly influenced by morphology and sampling density, yielding higher vertical random errors and more prone to slightly overestimate seabed depths. In addition, sampling density and morphology were the factors that most influenced the vertical accuracy of the interpolated DBM. In this sense, the highly statistically significant influence of the interaction between sampling density and morphology on the vertical accuracy of the interpolated DBM confirms the need to perform a preliminary analysis of seabed morphological complexity in order to increase, if necessary, the number of surveyed points in cases of complex morphologies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3