Affiliation:
1. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80040, Mexico
2. Department of Civil Engineering, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80040, Mexico
Abstract
It has been proven that precise point positioning (PPP) is a well-established technique to obtain high-precision positioning in the order between centimeters and millimeters. In this context, different studies have been carried out to evaluate the performance of PPP in static mode as a possible alternative to the relative method. However, only a few studies have evaluated the performance of a large number of different open-source software programs and have focused extensively on online free PPP services. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive comparison of processing in static mode between different open-source software and the online free PPP services is developed. For the evaluation, different GNSS observation files collected at 45 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations distributed worldwide were processed in static PPP mode. Within this frame of reference, ten open-source PPP software and five online free PPP services were studied. The results from the processing strategy demonstrate that it is possible to obtain precision in the order of millimeters with both open-source software and online PPP services. In addition, online PPP services experienced better performance than some other specialized PPP software. In summary, the results show that the daily solutions for the E (East), N (North), and U (Up) components estimated by the ten open-source software and by the five online free PPP services can reach millimeter precision for some stations. Among the open-source software, the PRIDE-PPPAR presented the best performance with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 5.52, 5.40, and 6.79 mm in the E, N, and U components, respectively. Alternatively, in the case of the online free PPP services, the APPS and CSRS-PPP produced the most accurate results, with RMSE values less than 12 mm for the three components. Finally, the open-source software and online free PPP services experienced similar positioning performance in the horizontal and vertical components, demonstrating that both can be implemented in static mode without compromising the accuracy of the measurement.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference56 articles.
1. Point positioning concept using precise ephemeris;Anderle;Satell. Doppler Position.,1976
2. Precise Point Positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks;Zumbergue;J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth,1997
3. Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products;Kouba;GPS Solut.,2001
4. Xi, R., Chen, Q., Meng, X., Psimoulis, P., Jiang, W., and Xu, C. (2021). Pass-by-Pass Ambiguity Resolution in Single GPS Receiver PPP Using Observations for Two Sequential Days: An Exploratory Study. Remote Sens., 13.
5. Liu, T., Wang, J., Yu, H., Cao, X., and Ge, Y. (2018). A new weighting approach with application to ionospheric delay constraint for GPS/GALILEO real-time precise point positioning. Appl. Sci., 8.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献