Affiliation:
1. Department of Ethnology, University of Tartu, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
2. Department of Anthropology, University of Latvia, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia
Abstract
Residential education often both challenges and reinforces the norms and systems supporting children and young people’s need for homely environments. In this context, studies on pupils’ sense of home when attending residential schools provide a ground for exploring broader infrastructures of care available to them as they move through different spaces. Drawing on autoethnography, life-story interviews, and semi-structured interviews, we illustrate how, for children within the Latvian residential school system, homeliness may be found at a relative’s apartment, school bus or youth center affected by how each of the spaces relates to children’s safety and control, privacy, community, identity, everyday life, and time. While normative discourses remain fixated on home as a family space where infrastructures of care can be limited, but educational settings emphasize control as a measure for safety without being attentive to peer-to-peer relationships, children’s agency in achieving a sense of homeliness becomes fragmented and stronger in some places more than others.
Reference26 articles.
1. Structural Racism and Indigenous Health: What Indigenous Perspectives of Residential School and Boarding School Tell Us? A Case Study of Canada and Finland;Juutilainen;Int. Indig. Policy J.,2014
2. Rockhill, E.K. (2010). Lost to the State: Family Discontinuity, Social Orphanhood, and Residential Care in the Russian Far East, Berghahn Books.
3. Lenhard, J., and Samanani, F. (2019). Home: Ethnographic Encounters, Routledge.
4. Oikography: Ethnographies of house-ing in critical times;Biehl;Cult. Anthropol.,2021
5. Positive Peer Relationships, Coping and Resilience in Young People in Alternative Care: A Systematic Review;Haddow;Child. Youth Serv. Rev.,2021