Abstract
“A circular economy is one that is regenerative by design and aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times, distinguishing between technical and biological cycles. This new economic model seeks to ultimately decouple global economic development from finite resource consumption”, states the widely used definition of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. This definition conveys two messages. First, it acknowledges that economic activities need natural inputs (energy and material) and generate outputs in the form of waste as well as emissions. Second, it embodies the promise that, through technological innovations, human ingenuity and the market, a full decoupling of the economy from nature can be reached. Obviously both messages are not consistent with each other. Analyzing these issues through the lens of a transdisciplinary approach, which combines insight from thermodynamics with conventional economic theory, is the purpose of this paper. By using such physico-economic perspective, it is argued that not any kind of a circular economy is sustainable. Therefore, indicators are required through which it can be assured that a particular fashion of a circular economy reduces both environmental and social harm.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference40 articles.
1. Product-Life Factor An Inquiry into the Nature of Sustainable Societies: The Role of the Private Sectorhttp://www.product-life.org/en/major-publications/the-product-life-factor
2. Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transitionhttps://kidv.nl/media/rapportages/towards_a_circular_economy.pdf?1.2.1
3. From elite folk science to the policy legend of the circular economy
4. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?
5. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process;Georgescu-Roegen,1971
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献