Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women’s Lives

Abstract

Study Objective: To investigate diverse hysterectomy techniques to determine their influence on patient outcomes, including pain levels, sexual function, anxiety, and quality of life. Of particular focus is the comparison between vessel sealing and traditional suturing in abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies. This study is unique in its comprehensive evaluation, considering patient satisfaction, recommendation rates, recovery times, and various other aspects. Method: Our prospective cohort study adhered to ethical guidelines, involving a meticulous assessment of patients, including medical history, anxiety levels, pelvic pain, sexual function, and quality of life. Surgical methods were explained to patients, allowing them to actively participate in the decision-making process. Sociodemographic information was collected, and exclusion criteria were applied. Hysterectomy methods included total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and a modified vaginal technique known as VH Mujas. Several parameters were recorded, including operation indications, uterine volume, hospital stay, operation duration, pre-operative and post-operative complications, and more. Results: In all groups, a statistically significant increase was found in pre-operative–post-operative FSFI sexual function values (p < 0.001). The patient’s basal Beck Anxiety Scale scores significantly decreased following the decision for vaginal surgery, both in the VH and VH Mujas groups (p < 0.05). However, Beck Anxiety Scale scores at patients’ initial assessments significantly increased following the decision for abdominal and laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.001). According to the results of the SF-36 quality of life assessment, an increase was observed in all post-operative quality of life parameters in patients who underwent surgery with different methods due to VH (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our comprehensive comparison of hysterectomy techniques demonstrated that VH, particularly when utilizing the Mujas technique, outperforms other hysterectomy methods regarding patient safety and post-operative satisfaction but also offers the benefit of minimal invasiveness. Notably, this is reflected in improved quality of life, enhanced sexual function, lower pain scores, and favorable cosmetic results. The success of a hysterectomy procedure depends on precise indications, surgical planning, proper patient selection, and effective communication. This study emphasizes the significance of these factors in achieving optimal outcomes. The development of specialized vascular closure devices can further enhance the feasibility of vaginal hysterectomy, making it a preferable choice in gynecological surgery. The study contributes valuable insights into selecting the most suitable hysterectomy method for patients and optimizing their recovery.