Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health

Author:

Khangura Ravjit1,Ferris David2,Wagg Cameron3ORCID,Bowyer Jamie4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia

2. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, Northam, WA 6401, Australia

3. Fredericton Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, NB E3B 4Z7, Canada

4. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia

Abstract

Conventional farming practices can lead to soil degradation and a decline in productivity. Regenerative agriculture (RA) is purported by advocates as a solution to these issues that focuses on soil health and carbon sequestration. The fundamental principles of RA are to keep the soil covered, minimise soil disturbance, preserve living roots in the soil year round, increase species diversity, integrate livestock, and limit or eliminate the use of synthetic compounds (such as herbicides and fertilisers). The overall objectives are to rejuvenate the soil and land and provide environmental, economic, and social benefits to the wider community. Despite the purported benefits of RA, a vast majority of growers are reluctant to adopt these practices due to a lack of empirical evidence on the claimed benefits and profitability. We examined the reported benefits and mechanisms associated with RA against available scientific data. The literature suggests that agricultural practices such as minimum tillage, residue retention, and cover cropping can improve soil carbon, crop yield, and soil health in certain climatic zones and soil types. Excessive use of synthetic chemicals can lead to biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. Combining livestock with cropping and agroforestry in the same landscape can increase soil carbon and provide several co-benefits. However, the benefits of RA practices can vary among different agroecosystems and may not necessarily be applicable across multiple agroecological regions. Our recommendation is to implement rigorous long-term farming system trials to compare conventional and RA practices in order to build knowledge on the benefits and mechanisms associated with RA on regional scales. This will provide growers and policy-makers with an evidence base from which to make informed decisions about adopting RA practices to realise their social and economic benefits and achieve resilience against climate change.

Funder

Ministerial initiative of the Western Australian Government

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference444 articles.

1. Gabel, M. (1979). Ho-Ping: A World Scenario for Food Production, World Game Institute.

2. Learning to Think Regeneratively;Rodale;Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc.,1986

3. The potential for regenerative agriculture in the developing world;Francis;Am. J. Altern. Agric.,1986

4. Drawdown the Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming;Duchin;Science,2017

5. Soil health: Research, practice and policy for a more regenerative agriculture;Sherwood;Appl. Soil Ecol.,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3