Promoting Complex Problem Solving by Introducing Schema-Governed Categories of Key Causal Models

Author:

Kessler Franziska1,Proske Antje1ORCID,Urbas Leon2,Goldwater Micah3,Krieger Florian4,Greiff Samuel5ORCID,Narciss Susanne16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

3. School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia

4. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany

5. Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

6. Center of Tactile Internet with Human in the Loop (CeTI), Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Abstract

The ability to recognize key causal models across situations is associated with expertise. The acquisition of schema-governed category knowledge of key causal models may underlie this ability. In an experimental study (n = 183), we investigated the effects of promoting the construction of schema-governed categories and how an enhanced ability to recognize the key causal models relates to performance in complex problem-solving tasks that are based on the key causal models. In a 2 × 2 design, we tested the effects of an adapted version of an intervention designed to build abstract mental representations of the key causal models and a tutorial designed to convey conceptual understanding of the key causal models and procedural knowledge. Participants who were enabled to recognize the underlying key causal models across situations as a result of the intervention and the tutorial (i.e., causal sorters) outperformed non-causal sorters in the subsequent complex problem-solving task. Causal sorters outperformed the control group, except for the subtask knowledge application in the experimental group that did not receive the tutorial and, hence, did not have the opportunity to elaborate their conceptual understanding of the key causal models. The findings highlight that being able to categorize novel situations according to their underlying key causal model alone is insufficient for enhancing the transfer of the according concept. Instead, for successful application, conceptual and procedural knowledge also seem to be necessary. By using a complex problem-solving task as the dependent variable for transfer, we extended the scope of the results to dynamic tasks that reflect some of the typical challenges of the 21st century.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference108 articles.

1. Özkiziltan, D., and Hassel, A. (2021). Humans versus Machines: An Overview of Research on the Effects of Automation of Work. SSRN Electron. J.

2. Dechema, u.V.D.I. (2017). Modulare Anlagen: Flexible Chemische Produktion durch Modularisierung und Standardisierung—Status Quo und zukünftige Trends, ProcessNet.

3. Adaptive Automation, Level of Automation, Allocation Authority, Supervisory Control, and Adaptive Control: Distinctions and Modes of Adaptation;Sheridan;IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum.,2011

4. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., and ten Hompel, M. (2017). Handbuch Industrie 4.0 Bd.3, Springer.

5. The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration;Autor;Q. J. Econ.,2003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3