Abstract
Recently, some commercially available active-type radon–thoron monitors were developed; however, their performance has not been characterized. This article presents the characteristics of three commercially available active-type radon–thoron monitors (RAD7, Radon Mapper, and AlphaGUARD) at different sampling flow rates. The thoron concentration measured by the monitors was compared with the reference value measured by a grab sampling method. As a result, the ratio of the measured concentration to the reference increased with flow rate for the RAD7 and the Radon Mapper although that of the AlphaGUARD decreased. The difference may be attributed to the coefficients used in the calculation and the measurement time scheme. The results indicate the importance of the sampling flow rate in thoron measurement. Monitoring of flow rate at the measurement and periodic calibration at multiple sampling flow rates should be conducted for quality assurance and quality control of the measurand.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Hirosaki University
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference32 articles.
1. Cancer Registry and Statistics
https://ganjoho.jp/data/reg_stat/statistics/dl/cancer_mortality(1958-2019).xls
2. WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon—A Public Health Perspective,2009
3. Why is 220Rn (thoron) measurement important?
4. Indoor radon and thoron levels in Neendakara and Chavara regions of Southern Coastal Kerala, India
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献