Abstract
There are several reasons for environmental taxation implementation. Besides its environmental impact, the main reason for such taxation is its fiscal impact, particularly in generating revenues of public budgets. The main goal of this paper is to observe possible spatial patterns in fiscal impacts of environmental taxation in the EU countries, and to depict the groups of countries with the same (or similar) fiscal impact of these instruments on public budget revenues, including environmental and economic characteristics. Two methods of cluster analysis are used, Ward linkage and K-nearest neighbors (spatial) cluster analysis to observe potential geographical links or implication of fiscal impact. The study is performed for the years 2008 and 2017. Based on the results, we can say that in the year 2008, the EU countries were divided into “the west” and “the east”, with some exceptions. The western countries were characterized by high environmental tax revenues, the eastern countries by low environmental tax revenues. For 2017, the situation is different. The border between old and new EU member states is not so abrupt and clear. The results show higher diversification between EU countries concerning the fiscal impacts of environmental taxation.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Development
Reference36 articles.
1. Optimal Dynamic Carbon Taxes in a Climate–Economy Model with Distortionary Fiscal Policy
2. Firm responses to a carbon price: corporate decision making under British Columbia's carbon tax
3. Emission Spot Primary Market Auction Report 2017https://www.eex.com/en/market-data/environmental-markets/eua-primary-auction-spot-download
4. How Grouping Analysis Workshttps://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/how-grouping-analysis-works.htm
5. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). European Unionhttps://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/factsheet_ets_en.pdf
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献