Scenario Identification and Classification to Support the Assessment of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

Author:

Kayatas Zafer1ORCID,Bestle Dieter2

Affiliation:

1. Mercedes-Benz AG, Kolumbusstr. 19+21, 71063 Sindelfingen, Germany

2. Chair of Engineering Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, Germany

Abstract

In recent years, driver assistance systems in cars, buses, and trucks have become more common and powerful. In particular, the introduction of AI methods to sensors, signal fusion, and traffic recognition allows us to step forward from actual level-2 assistance to level-3 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), where driving becomes autonomous and responsibility shifts from the driver to the automobile manufacturers. This, however, requires a high-precision risk assessment of failure, which can only be achieved by extensive data acquisition and statistical analysis of real traffic scenarios (which is impossible to perform by humans). Therefore, critical driving situations have to be identified and classified automatically. This paper develops and compares two different strategies—a traditional rule-based approach derived from deterministic causal considerations, and an AI-based approach trained with idealized cut-in, cut-out, and cut-through maneuvers. Application to a 10-h measurement sequence on a German highway demonstrates that the latter has the higher performance, whereas the former misses some of the safety-relevant events to be identified.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference23 articles.

1. Europäisches Parlament (2024, August 07). Safer Roads: New EU Measures to Reduce Car Accidents. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20190307STO30715/safer-roads-new-eu-measures-to-reduce-car-accidents.

2. Society of Automotive Engineers (2021). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, SAE International. ISO, J3016_202104.

3. van der Aalst, W. (2022). Six Levels of Autonomous Process Execution Management. arXiv.

4. Richter, A., Walz, T.P., Dhanani, M., Häring, I., Vogelbacher, G., Höflinger, F., Finger, J., and Stolz, A. (2023, January 3–7). Components and their Failure Rates in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the 33rd European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2023), Southampton, UK.

5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3