Application of Same-Day Enterococcus qPCR-Based Analyses for Quality Assessment of Shorelines (Water and Sand) at Recreational Beaches

Author:

Saleem Faizan1,Edge Thomas A.1,Schellhorn Herb E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada

Abstract

Rapid water-quality monitoring methods for beach water and sand can be helpful for public health authorities to develop comprehensive beach monitoring programs. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Enterococcus qPCR (USEPA 1609.1) method for quality monitoring of beach water and sand-porewater at two Niagara region beaches in Ontario, Canada (Lakeside and Sunset Beaches). While the USEPA 1609.1 method has been validated for beach water, its potential for assessing associated beach sands (which may function as a microbial reservoir) has not been fully explored. All beach water samples (n = 168) passed the qPCR quality control (QC). However, only 20 out of 48 (41.7%) sand-porewater samples passed the qPCR QC, potentially due to interference by soluble inhibitors. The proportion of the sand-porewater samples passing QC improved slightly to 63 out of 120 (52.5%) with a prefiltration step to remove sand and other large particles. The faecal indicator density in the sand-porewater, tested in parallel, did not correlate with the beach water faecal indicator density. Comparing beach water data for the same-day Enterococcus qPCR threshold with the previous-day E. coli culturing-based threshold across all beach days tested, Enterococcus qPCR analyses identified 3 (7%) and 7 (16%) false positive/lost beach days for Lakeside and Sunset Beaches, respectively. Additionally, of the total beach days tested, Enterococcus qPCR analyses identified 2 (5%) and 1 (2%) false negative/health-risk days for Lakeside and Sunset Beaches, respectively. Sand-porewater testing analyses identified days when faecal indicators (in the sand) exceeded beach water quality thresholds. Compared with conventional E. coli culturing, use of the same-day qPCR method would result in fewer beach postings and could identify several additional health-risk days (when the beaches may not be posted). Future studies could include additional prefiltration steps or modifications in the Enterococcus qPCR protocol to improve the method’s applicability for sand quality monitoring.

Funder

Government of Ontario

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

Reference32 articles.

1. OMHLTC (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Population and Public Health Division) (2022, June 01). Operational Approaches for Recreational Water Guideline, Available online: https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/oph_standards/docs/protocols_guidelines/Operational_Approaches_to_Rec_Water_Guideline_2018_en.pdf.

2. Application of a rapid qPCR method for enterococci for beach water quality monitoring purposes in Hawaii: Loss of DNA during the extraction protocol due to coral sands;Seruge;Mar. Pollut. Bull.,2019

3. Routine screening of harmful microorganisms in beach sands: Implications to public health;Sabino;Sci. Total Environ.,2014

4. Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification;Dorevitch;Environ. Health,2017

5. Validation of qPCR method for enterococci quantification at Toronto beaches: Application for rapid recreational water monitoring;Saleem;J. Great Lakes Res.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3