Abstract
The circular bioeconomy offers solutions to curb the effects of climate change by focusing on the use of renewable, biological resources to produce food, energy, materials, and services. The substitution of fossil products by wood-based products can help avoid or reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle of products. However, it is important to understand the potential impacts of large-scale material substitution at the market level. This study aimed to assess the role of selected wood-based products in the circular bioeconomy, the possible changes in their markets, and investigate which elements could ensure the environmental sustainability of these products. The demand for graphic paper has declined over the last 15 years, while the demand for packaging has increased. Cross-laminated timber and man-made cellulosic fibres have seen their global consumption increase over the last decade. While there are benefits associated with the substitution of non-renewable materials by wood-based products, there is still limited understanding of the substitution effects at market-, country- and global level. Some factors enabling the further uptake of wood-based products include initiatives that stimulate technological change, incentives to produce or consume less fossil-based and more bio-based alternatives, and the promotion and marketing of wood-based products as viable alternatives to non-renewable materials.
Funder
European Union
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference135 articles.
1. Brondizio, E.S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., and Ngo, H.T. (2019). The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Secretariat.
2. (2022, December 22). IRP Global Material Flows Database 2020. UN Environment Programme, Secretariat of the International Resource Panel (IRP). Available online: https://www.resourcepanel.org/global-material-flows-database.
3. Assessing Global Resource Use and Greenhouse Emissions to 2050, with Ambitious Resource Efficiency and Climate Mitigation Policies;J. Clean. Prod.,2017
4. Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence;J. Ind. Ecol.,2018
5. Aguilar, A., Twardowski, T., and Wohlgemuth, R. (2019). Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development. Biotechnol. J., 14.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献