The ORIGINS Project: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nutrition Profile of Pregnant Women in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort
-
Published:2024-08-05
Issue:15
Volume:16
Page:2571
-
ISSN:2072-6643
-
Container-title:Nutrients
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nutrients
Author:
Pannu Poonam K.1, Scherini Alexander J. J.1ORCID, Silva Desiree T.123, Whalan Sarah1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands 6009, Australia 2. Faculty of Science, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia 3. Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup 6027, Australia
Abstract
Pregnancy is an opportunistic time for dietary intake to influence future disease susceptibility in offspring later in life. The ORIGINS Project was established to identify the factors that contribute to ‘a healthy start to life’ through a focus supporting childhood health and preventing disease (including non-communicable diseases). We aim to describe the dietary intakes of pregnant women in this cohort and to compare these to the Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) and Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). The usual food and nutrient intakes of women were collected using the Australian Eating Survey (AES), a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). A total of 374 women completed the AES FFQ at both 20 weeks and 36 weeks of gestation between December 2016 and January 2023. Macronutrient, micronutrient, and food group intake were explored using descriptive statistics. Overall, it was found that the energy contribution from carbohydrates was low, while that from fat and saturated fat was high; participants were not meeting the recommendations for several key micronutrients (calcium, iron, iodine, and folate); and they had low diet quality scores for all food groups. These findings suggest that despite the ongoing promotion of healthy eating during pregnancy, further exploration into why dietary guidelines during pregnancy are not being adhered to is warranted.
Funder
Telethon Perth Children’s Hospital Research Fund, Joondalup Health Campus Paul Ramsay Foundation Commonwealth Government of Australia
Reference64 articles.
1. Global action, but national results: Strengthening pathways towards better health outcomes for non-communicable diseases;Magnusson;Crit. Public Health,2021 2. The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: A systematic review;Muka;Eur. J. Epidemiol.,2015 3. World Health Organisation (2000). Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases (WHAA53/14), World Health Organisation. 4. Devaux, M., Lerouge, A., Giuffre, G., Giesecke, S., Baiocco, S., Ricci, A., Reyes, F., Cantarero, D., Ventelou, B., and Cecchini, M. (2020). How will the main risk factors contribute to the burden of non-communicable diseases under different scenarios by 2050? A modelling study. PLoS ONE, 15. 5. Stråvik, M., Jönsson, K., Hartvigsson, O., Sandin, A., Wold, A.E., Sandberg, A., and Barman, M. (2019). Food and Nutrient Intake during Pregnancy in Relation to Maternal Characteristics: Results from the NICE Birth Cohort in Northern Sweden. Nutrients, 11.
|
|