Merging Ontologies and Data from Electronic Health Records

Author:

Calcagno Salvatore1,Calvagna Andrea2ORCID,Tramontana Emiliano2ORCID,Verga Gabriella2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cyberetna, 95024 Catania, Italy

2. Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy

Abstract

The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a system for collecting and storing patient medical records as data that can be mechanically accessed, hence facilitating and assisting the medical decision-making process. EHRs exist in several formats, and each format lists thousands of keywords to classify patients data. The keywords are specific and are medical jargon; hence, data classification is very accurate. As the keywords constituting the formats of medical records express concepts by means of specific jargon without definitions or references, their proper use is left to clinicians and could be affected by their background, hence the interpretation of data could become slow or less accurate than that desired. This article presents an approach that accurately relates data in EHRs to ontologies in the medical realm. Thanks to ontologies, clinicians can be assisted when writing or analysing health records, e.g., our solution promptly suggests rigorous definitions for scientific terms, and automatically connects data spread over several parts of EHRs. The first step of our approach consists of converting selected data and keywords from several EHR formats into a format easier to parse, then the second step is merging the extracted data with specialised medical ontologies. Finally, enriched versions of the medical data are made available to professionals. The proposed approach was validated by taking samples of medical records and ontologies in the real world. The results have shown both versatility on handling data, precision of query results, and appropriate suggestions for relations among medical records.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference34 articles.

1. Using IHE and HL7 conformance to specify consistent PACS interoperability for a large multi-center enterprise;Henderson;J. Healthc. Inf. Manag.,2006

2. Active learning of the HL7 medical standard;Noumeir;J. Digit. Imaging,2019

3. Automatic ontology construction from text: A review from shallow to deep learning trend;Chan;Artif. Intell. Rev.,2020

4. Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: A systematic review and data synthesis;Dissanayake;J. Am. Med Inform. Assoc.,2020

5. Human Disease Ontology 2018 update: Classification, content and workflow expansion;Schriml;Nucleic Acids Res.,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3