Abstract
To date, the legal aspects of the ongoing debate on the application of genome editing in human gametes and early embryos have attracted little attention. In Europe, this seems to have changed with a recent official position that clarifies the meaning of the relevant provision of the common legal instrument on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention). This provision explicitly prohibits modifications to the genome of future persons and adoptes a precautionary stance with regard to genetic interventions in the human reproductive material. In this article, we examine relevant interpretative options, following the new official clarifications, focusing on the research/clinical application distinctions that characterize their approach. From this viewpoint, we propose an approach that favors basic research activities involving genome editing, even for exploring potential clinical applications under conditions of safety, which may justify a future legislative amendment. Furthermore, we explore the patenting issue, based on the current approach of European case law, and give reasons that may justify patent rights in this ethically sensitive area.
Subject
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Biomedical Engineering,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Biotechnology
Reference30 articles.
1. Steering Committee for Human Rights in the Fields of Biomedicine and Health (CDBIO) (2022, December 01). Intervention on the Human Genome. Re-examination Process of Article 13 of the Oviedo Convention. Conclusions and Clarifications. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/cdbio-2022-7-final-clarifications-er-art-13-e-/1680a8736c.
2. The future of gene therapy;Thrasher;Nature,2004
3. History of gene therapy;Wirth;Gene,2013
4. CRISPR in animals and animal models;Shrock;Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.,2017
5. CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria;Yao;Synth. Syst. Biotechnol.,2018
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献