Affiliation:
1. Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
Abstract
Knowledge about the genetic diversity of the available common bean germplasm can help breeders properly direct the choice of genetic material in the breeding process. The aim of the present work was to estimate the usefulness of 10 RAPD and 10 SCoT markers in genetic diversity detection among 33 common bean genotypes. Both molecular marker systems were able to generate high levels of polymorphism in the genetic material, which was supported by the relatively high polymorphic information content (PIC) values observed for the used markers. The Diversity Detection Index (DDI) and Marker Index (MI) were used to compare the effectiveness of RAPD and SCoT markers. For both techniques, high values of MI and DDI were calculated, representing their effectivity. The SCoT markers showed higher values of the parameters used (MI = 7.474, DI = 2.265) than the RAPD markers (MI = 5.323, DDI = 1.612), indicating their higher efficiency in the detection of molecular variability. Three constructed dendrograms and PCoA plots were created using RAPD and SCoT, and both methods combined confirmed sufficient separation of the bean genotypes from each other. At the same time, a higher efficiency of SCoT markers compared to RAPD markers in the detection of the genetic diversity of beans was also proven. The results may be of future interest in the choice of genetically distant material for breeding purposes.
Funder
KEGA
VEGA
Operational programme Integrated Infrastructure
European Regional Development Fund
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference65 articles.
1. Myers, J.R., and Kmiecik, K. (2017). The Common Bean Genome, Springer. Compendium of Plant Genomes.
2. Common Bean: A legume model on the rise for unraveling responses and adaptations to iron, zinc, and phosphate deficiencies;Front. Plant Sci.,2016
3. Beans (Phaseolus spp.)—model food legumes;Broughton;Plant Soil,2003
4. Celmeli, T., Sari, H., Canci, H., Sari, D., Adak, A., Eker, T., and Toker, C. (2018). The nutritional content of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in comparison to modern varieties. Agronomy, 8.
5. Plant health and its effects on food safety and security in a one health framework: Four case studies;Rizzo;One Health Outlook,2021