The Effect of Different Cropping Systems on Yield, Quality, Productivity Elements, and Morphological Characters in Wheat (Triticum aestivum)
Author:
Paunescu Ramona Aida1, Bonciu Elena2ORCID, Rosculete Elena3ORCID, Paunescu Gabriela4, Rosculete Catalin Aurelian2
Affiliation:
1. Syngenta Agro Romania, 73-81 Bucuresti-Ploiesti Street, 013685 Bucharest, Romania 2. Department of Agricultural and Forestry Technology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza Street, 200585 Craiova, Romania 3. Department of Land Measurement, Management, Mechanization, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza Street, 200585 Craiova, Romania 4. SCDA Caracal, University of Craiova, 106 Vasile Alecsandri Street, 235200 Caracal, Romania
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study how certain applied cropping systems (conventional systems differentiated by fertilization level or sowing season and subsistence farming) influence yield, quality, productivity elements, and morphological characters in a collection of Romanian and foreign wheat cultivars. The following indicators were evaluated: productive potential (yield), quality (test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, sedimentation index, and gluten index), as well as other elements that determine yield (number of ears/square meter, thousand kernel weight, number of grains/ear, and weight of grains/ear) and plant height. The results show that the cropping systems influenced all the elements studied except the thousand-kernel weight. The only characteristics influenced by higher nitrogen fertilization were test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, and gluten index. The superiority of a delayed conventional system was shown by the number of grains/wheat ear and the deformation index. Protein content was differentiated between the conventional and the subsistence system, but especially between the low-input and the conventional system. Nitrogen supply is the most important factor for determining wheat productivity and grain quality.
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference69 articles.
1. Bux, C., Lombardi, M., Varese, E., and Amicarelli, V. (2022). Economic and Environmental Assessqment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy. Sustainability, 14. 2. Comparing the Profitability of Organic and Conventional Production in Family Farming: Empirical Evidence from Brazil;Froehlich;Ecol. Econ.,2018 3. Ozturk, M., and Gul, A. (2020). Climate Change and Food Security with Emphasis on Wheat, Academic Press. 4. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers;Poore;Science,2018 5. Wiebe, K., Sulser, T.B., Dunston, S., Rosegrant, M.W., Fuglie, K., Willenbockel, D., and Nelson, G.C. (2021). Modeling impacts of faster productivity growth to inform the CGIAR initiative on Crops to End Hunger. PLoS ONE, 16.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|