Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia
2. The School of Natural Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, 690090 Vladivostok, Russia
Abstract
Many grape endophytic microorganisms exhibit high potential for suppressing the development of grape diseases and stimulating grapevine growth and fitness, as well as beneficial properties of the crop. The microbiome of wild grapevines is a promising source of biocontrol agents, which can be beneficial for domesticated grapevines. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and classical microbiology techniques, we performed an analysis of bacterial and fungal endophytic communities of wild grapevines Vitis amurensis Rupr. and Vitis coignetiae Pulliat growing in the Russian Far East. According to the NGS analysis, 24 and 18 bacterial taxa from the class level were present in V. amurensis and V. coignetiae grapevines, respectively. Gammaproteobacteria (35%) was the predominant class of endophytic bacteria in V. amurensis and Alphaproteobacteria (46%) in V. coignetiae. Three taxa, namely Sphingomonas, Methylobacterium, and Hymenobacter, were the most common bacterial genera for V. amurensis and V. coignetiae. Metagenomic analysis showed the presence of 23 and 22 fungi and fungus-like taxa of class level in V. amurensis and V. coignetiae, respectively. The predominant fungal classes were Dothideomycetes (61–65%) and Tremellomycetes (10–11%), while Cladosporium and Aureobasidium were the most common fungal genera in V. amurensis and V. coignetiae, respectively. A comparative analysis of the endophytic communities of V. amurensis and V. coignetiae with the previously reported endophytic communities of V. vinifera revealed that the bacterial biodiversity of V. amurensis and V. coignetiae was similar in alpha diversity to V. vinifera’s bacterial biodiversity. The fungal alpha diversity of V. amurensis and V. coignetiae was statistically different from that of V. vinifera. The beta diversity analysis of bacterial and fungal endophytes showed that samples of V. vinifera formed separate clusters, while V. amurensis samples formed a separate cluster including V. coignetiae samples. The data revealed that the endophytic community of bacteria and fungi from wild V. amurensis was richer than that from V. coignetiae grapes and cultivated V. vinifera grapes. Therefore, the data obtained in this work could be of high value in the search for potentially useful microorganisms for viticulture.
Funder
Russian Science Foundation
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference77 articles.
1. The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes;Hardoim;Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,2015
2. Natural Products from Endophytic Microorganisms;Strobel;J. Nat. Prod.,2004
3. Endophytic Bacteria and Their Potential Application in Agriculture: A Review;Firdous;Indian J. Agric. Res.,2019
4. Kandel, S.L., Joubert, P.M., and Doty, S.L. (2017). Bacterial Endophyte Colonization and Distribution within Plants. Microorganisms, 5.
5. Bioprospecting Foliar Endophytic Fungi of Vitis labrusca Linnaeus, Bordô and Concord Cv;Felber;Ann. Microbiol.,2016