Definition of Regulatory Targets for Electricity Default Rate in Brazil: Proposition of a Fuzzy Inference-Based Model

Author:

Celestino Nivia Maria1,Calili Rodrigo1ORCID,Louzada Daniel1ORCID,Almeida Maria Fatima1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Postgraduate Programme in Metrology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, Brazil

Abstract

The current electricity default rates in continental countries, such as Brazil, pose risks to the economic stability and investment capabilities of distribution utilities. This situation results in higher electricity tariffs for regular customers. From a regulatory perspective, the key issue regarding this challenge is devising incentive mechanisms that reward distribution utilities for their operational and investment choices, aiming to mitigate or decrease electricity non-payment rates and avoid tariff increases for regular customers. Despite adhering to the principles of incentive regulation, the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL) uses a methodological approach to define regulatory targets for electricity defaults tied to econometric models developed to determine targets to combat electricity non-technical losses (NTLs). This methodology has been widely criticized by electricity distribution utilities and academics because it includes many ad hoc steps and fails to consider the components that capture the specificities and heterogeneity of distribution utilities. This study proposes a fuzzy inference-based model for defining regulatory default targets built independently of the current methodological approach adopted by ANEEL and aligned with the principles of incentive regulation. An empirical study focusing on the residential class of electricity consumption demonstrated that it is possible to adopt a specific methodology for determining regulatory default targets and that the fuzzy inference approach can meet the necessary premises to ensure that the principles of incentive regulation and the establishment of regulatory targets are consistent with the reality of each electricity distribution utility.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference42 articles.

1. Price Water House Coopers (2016). Best Practices and Strategies for Distribution Loss Reduction, Price Water House Coopers (PWC).

2. Miranda, M., Ruffin, C., Dantas, G., Pedreira, N., Guerra, M., Zamboni, L., Mendes, P., and Alvares, J. (2019, January 12–15). International review of regulatory aspects related to electricity loss in distribution sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Energy 2019, Västerås, Sweden.

3. Carr, D., and Thomson, M. (2022). Non-technical electricity losses. Energies, 15.

4. Non-technical losses in Brazil: Overview, challenges, and directions for identification and mitigation;Savian;Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy,2022

5. Araújo, A.C.M. (2007). Tese (doutorado)-Coordenação dos Programas de Pós-Graduação de Engenharia-COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3