Affiliation:
1. Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Policy, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
2. Faculty of Law and Interdisciplinary Faculty, Rostock University, 18051 Rostock, Germany
Abstract
The German Constitutional Court’s climate verdict provided a re-interpretation of core liberal-democratic concepts, and it is highly relevant for liberal constitutional law in general, including EU and international law—where similar issues are currently being discussed in ongoing trials before the European Court of Human Rights and the International Court of Justice. The present article applies a legal interpretation to analyse the national and transnational implications of the ruling. The results show that the verdict accepts human rights as intertemporal and globally applicable. It applies the precautionary principle to these rights and frees them from the misleading causality debate. However, the court failed to address the most important violations of human rights, it categorised climate policy as a greater threat to freedom than climate change, and the court failed to acknowledge that the Paris 1.5-degree limit implies a radically smaller carbon budget. Furthermore, little attention has so far been paid to the fact that the ruling implies an obligation for greater EU climate protection, especially since most emissions are regulated supranationally. Against this backdrop, the EU emissions trading system demands a reform, which has to go well beyond the existing EU proposals so as to enable societal transformations towards sustainability.
Funder
Environmental Federal Agency of the German Federal Government
Felix Ekardt on climate litigation
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference112 articles.
1. Ekardt, F., Wieding, J., and Zorn, A. (2018). Paris Agreement, Precautionary Principle and Human Rights: Zero Emissions in Two Decades?. Sustainability, 10.
2. Wieding, J., Stubenrauch, J., and Ekardt, F. (2020). Human Rights and Precautionary Principle: Limits to Geoengineering, SRM, and IPCC Scenarios. Sustainability, 12.
3. The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: The Hague Court of Appeal upholds judgment requiring the Netherlands to further reduce its greenhouse gas emissions;Verschuuren;RECIEL,2019
4. Climate Change Litigation and the European Court of Human Rights–A Strategic Next Step?;Niska;J. World Energy Law Bus.,2020
5. (2023, June 06). FCC, Order of 24 March 2021, 1 BvR 2656/18 et al. Available online: www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de.