Abstract
At present, the isotope ratio 18O/16O (in the text expressed as δ18O) of carbonate (CO32−) is usually determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry measuring the CO2 gas produced dissolving the CO32−-bearing substance in concentrated H3PO4. As with any analytical data, the δ18O values of carbonate are also affected by uncertainty which must be considered mainly when data from different laboratories are compared. Usually, scientific papers report only repeatability and/or reproducibility of analytical results, which, have scarce significance for data comparison. With the aim of evaluating the overall uncertainty for new analytical data for low-Mg calcites, in this paper we reconsidered the δ18O data, which are reported in the literature. Two kinds of uncertainty must be taken into account: (1) that due to the calibration of the delta values using international standards (prediction uncertainty), (2) that due to small differences in the chemistry of low-Mg calcites. The two uncertainties must be added when comparing data produced in the same or different laboratories. We found that this overall uncertainty cannot be lower than about 0.2‰. Thus, uncertainty lower than 0.2‰, sometimes reported in the literature, is misleading.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science