Metaanalysis of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Efficacy for OCD Treatment: The Impact of Stimulation Parameters, Symptom Subtype and rTMS-Induced Electrical Field

Author:

Dehghani-Arani Fateme1,Kazemi Reza2ORCID,Hallajian Amir-Homayun13ORCID,Sima Sepehr14ORCID,Boutimaz Samaneh1ORCID,Hedayati Sepideh5ORCID,Koushamoghadam Saba6ORCID,Safarifard Razieh1ORCID,Salehinejad Mohammad Ali47ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran

2. Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran 1738953355, Iran

3. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands

4. School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran 1956836613, Iran

5. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

6. Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1445613111, Iran

7. Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 44139 Dortmund, Germany

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has recently demonstrated significant potential in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, its effectiveness depends on various parameters, including stimulation parameters, OCD subtypes and electrical fields (EFs) induced by rTMS in targeted brain regions that are less studied. Methods: Using the PRISMA approach, we examined 27 randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted from 1985 to 2024 using rTMS for the treatment of OCD and conducted several meta-analyses to investigate the role of rTMS parameters, including the EFs induced by each rTMS protocol, and OCD subtypes on treatment efficacy. Results: A significant, medium effect size was found, favoring active rTMS (gPPC = 0.59, p < 0.0001), which was larger for the obsession subscale. Both supplementary motor area (SMA) rTMS (gPPC = 0.82, p = 0.048) and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) rTMS (gPPC = 1.14, p = 0.04) demonstrated large effect sizes, while the right DLPFC showed a significant moderate effect size for reducing OCD severity (gPPC = 0.63, p = 0.012). These protocols induced the largest EFs in dorsal cognitive, ventral cognitive and sensorimotor circuits. rTMS protocols targeting DLPFC produced the strongest electrical fields in cognitive circuits, while pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) rTMS protocols induced larger fields in regions linked to emotional and affective processing in addition to cognitive circuits. The pre-SMA rTMS modulated more circuits involved in OCD pathophysiology—sensorimotor, cognitive, affective, and frontolimbic—with larger electrical fields than the other protocols. Conclusions: While rTMS shows moderate overall clinical efficacy, protocols targeting ventral and dorsal cognitive and sensorimotor circuits demonstrate the highest potential. The pre-SMA rTMS appears to induce electrical fields in more circuits relevant to OCD pathophysiology.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference121 articles.

1. Consensus recommendations for the clinical application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of depression;McClintock;J. Clin. Psychiatry,2017

2. Updated Review on the Clinical Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders;Guo;Neurosci. Bull.,2017

3. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines;Rossi;Clin. Neurophysiol.,2021

4. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children;Salehinejad;Curr. Opin. Psychiatry,2024

5. Real-world efficacy of deep TMS for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Post-marketing data collected from twenty-two clinical sites;Roth;J. Psychiatr. Res.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3