Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Approaches for Managing Aortic Pathologies: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Aljabri Badr1,Iqbal Kaisor1,Alanezi Tariq2ORCID,Al-Salman Mussaad1,Altuwaijri Talal1ORCID,Aldossary Mohammed Yousef13ORCID,Alarify Ghadah A.2ORCID,Alhadlaq Leen S.2ORCID,Alhamlan Sarah A.2ORCID,AlSheikh Sultan1ORCID,Altoijry Abdulmajeed1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11322, Saudi Arabia

2. College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11322, Saudi Arabia

3. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam 32245, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Since thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are increasingly utilized, examining their outcomes and safety in real-world scenarios is crucial. This study investigated the management and outcomes of TEVAR and EVAR as alternatives to traditional open surgical repair for managing aortic pathologies. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed the data from 59 consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR or EVAR between 2015 and 2022 at a single tertiary care center. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were complications assessment, including re-intervention and occurrence of endoleaks. Results: TEVAR accounted for 47.5% of cases (n = 28), while EVAR comprised 52.5% (n = 31). Patients were mostly 61–70 years old (23.7%) and male (91.5%). Surgery indications differed, with aneurysmal repair being the prevalent indication for EVAR (90.3%, n = 28) and trauma being the main indication for TEVAR (67.9%, n = 19). Regarding the primary outcome, 11 patients (18.6%) died for various reasons; of those, 2 patients (3.4%) were determined to have died from vascular-related issues. Most patients (81.4%, n = 48) did not experience intraoperative complications. The most common intraoperative complications were endoleaks and access failure, each affecting 5.1% (n = 3) of patients. Re-intervention was necessary in 16.9% (n = 10) of cases, with endoleaks being the major indication (60%). Emergency intervention was more frequent in the TEVAR group (p = 0.013), resulting in significantly longer hospitalization (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Despite limitations, our analysis indicates a good safety profile with high success rates and a low incidence of adverse health outcomes and mortality in TEVAR/EVAR procedures. Nevertheless, the results emphasize the ongoing concern of endograft leaks, necessitating re-interventions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. Aortic aneurysm;Mathur;J. Transl. Int. Med.,2016

2. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms;Kuivaniemi;Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther.,2015

3. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms;Filardo;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2015

4. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms;Schanzer;N. Engl. J. Med.,2021

5. Outcomes and survival following thoracic endovascular repair in patients with aortic aneurysms limited to the descending thoracic aorta;Fankhauser;J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3