Dynamic Risk Assessment in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Cheimonidis Pavlos1,Rantos Konstantinos1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, 654 04 Kavala, Greece

Abstract

Traditional information security risk assessment (RA) methodologies and standards, adopted by information security management systems and frameworks as a foundation stone towards robust environments, face many difficulties in modern environments where the threat landscape changes rapidly and new vulnerabilities are being discovered. In order to overcome this problem, dynamic risk assessment (DRA) models have been proposed to continuously and dynamically assess risks to organisational operations in (near) real time. The aim of this work is to analyse the current state of DRA models that have been proposed for cybersecurity, through a systematic literature review. The screening process led us to study 50 DRA models, categorised based on the respective primary analysis methods they used. The study provides insights into the key characteristics of these models, including the maturity level of the examined models, the domain or application area in which these models flourish, and the information they utilise in order to produce results. The aim of this work is to answer critical research questions regarding the development of dynamic risk assessment methodologies and provide insights on the already developed methods as well as future research directions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications

Reference76 articles.

1. Ross, R., McEvilley, M., and Oren, J.C. (2018). Systems Security Engineering: Considerations for a Multidisciplinary Approach in the Engineering of Trustworthy Secure Systems.

2. (2009). Risk Management—Vocabulary. Standard No. ISO Guide 73:2009.

3. Joint Task Force Interagency Working Group (2020). Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations, Technical report.

4. (2018). Risk Management—Guidelines. Standard No. ISO 31000:2018.

5. Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative (2018). Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations: A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3