Abstract
In Europe and many countries worldwide, a half-yearly changing time scheme has been adopted with the aim of optimizing the use of natural daylight during working hours and saving energy. Because the expected net economic benefit was not achieved, the discussion about the optimal solution has been reopened with a shifted focus on social and health related consequences. We set out to produce evidence for this discussion and analysed the impact of daylight saving time on total mortality of a general population in a time series study on daily total mortality for the years 1970–2018 in the city of Vienna, Austria. Daily deaths were modelled by Poisson regression controlling for seasonal and long-term trend, same-day and 14-day average temperature, humidity, and day of week. During the week after the spring transition a significant increase in daily total mortality of about 3% per day was observed. This was not the case during the week after the fall transition. The increase in daily mortality as observed in the week after spring DST-transition is most likely causally linked to the change in time scheme.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference20 articles.
1. Does Daylight Saving Save Electricity? A Meta-Analysis
2. Daylight time and energy: Evidence from an Australian experiment
3. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Discontinuing Seasonal Changes of Time and Repealing Directive 2000/84/EChttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0639&from=EN
4. Let the morning sunshine in
5. Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献