Abstract
Background: The mental health of the population consists of the three essential pillars of quality of life, economy, and society. Mental health services take care of the prevention and treatment of mental disorders and through them maintain, improve, and restore the mental health of the population. The purpose of this study is to describe the methodology for qualitative and quantitative evaluation and improvement of the mental health service system. Methods: This is a narrative review study that searches the literature to provide criteria, indicators, and methodology for evaluating and improving the quality of mental health services and the related qualitative and quantitative indicators. The bibliography was searched in popular databases PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, using the keywords “mental”, “health”, “quality”, “indicators”, alone or in combinations thereof. Results: Important quality indicators of mental health services have been collected and presented, and modified where appropriate. The definition of each indicator is presented here, alongside its method of calculation and importance. Each indicator belongs to one of the eight dimensions of quality assessment: (1) Suitability of services, (2) Accessibility of patients to services, (3) Acceptance of services by patients, (4) Ability of healthcare professionals to provide services, (5) Efficiency of health professionals and providers, (6) Continuity of service over time (ensuring therapeutic continuity), (7) Efficiency of health professionals and services, (8) Safety (for patients and for health professionals). Discussion/Conclusions: Accessibility and acceptability of service indicators are important for the attractiveness of services related to their use by the population. Profitability indicators are important economic indicators that affect the viability and sustainability of services, factors that are now taken into account in any health policy. All of the indicators mentioned are related to public health, affecting the quality of life, morbidity, mortality, and life expectancy, directly or indirectly. The systematic measurement and monitoring of indicators and the measurement and quantification of quality through them, are the basis for evidence-based health policy for improvement of the quality of mental health services.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference80 articles.
1. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness
2. Recommendation on Mental Health Monitoring for EUhttps://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/32569168/EurPsych_Wahlbeck_MINDFUL_2007.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DRecommendation_on_mental_health_monitori.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20191225%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20191225T014657Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=93061b500ccd4787571b1597339d55da85219056c9f1a94d8f68f7b2e4d6ba7b
3. Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective
4. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand
5. Why measuring quality of mental health care is still an unmet challenge and how to meet it
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献