Socio-Economic Assessment of Ecosystem-Based and Other Adaptation Strategies in Coastal Areas: A Systematic Review
-
Published:2023-02-02
Issue:2
Volume:11
Page:319
-
ISSN:2077-1312
-
Container-title:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMSE
Author:
Riera-Spiegelhalder Mar12, Campos-Rodrigues Luís2ORCID, Enseñado Elena Marie3ORCID, Dekker-Arlain Janneke den3, Papadopoulou Olympia4ORCID, Arampatzis Stratos4, Vervoort Koen5
Affiliation:
1. Local Sustainability, Institute for Local Development, UVEG University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain 2. Economics and Environment Unit, ENT Environment and Management, 08800 Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain 3. Urban Sustainability and Climate Change Resilience, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 Rotterdam, The Netherlands 4. Tero Monoprosopi Ike, 55132 Kalamaria, Greece 5. Projects Department, European Network of Living Labs, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Abstract
Coastal areas are highly vulnerable to climate-change hazards (e.g., sea-level rise, flooding, coastal erosion), which can lead to significant impacts at the ecosystem and societal level. Interest in ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) is gaining importance due to its potential multiple benefits, including social and environmental aspects, when compared to more traditional approaches such as hard engineering interventions. When assessing EbA strategies, further understanding of the nature–society functions, processes, values, and benefits is needed to increase its application. This study contributes to better knowledge of EbA and other adaptation strategies by developing a systematic literature review of studies performing socio-economic assessments of climate-change adaptation in coastal areas. The analysis of 54 publications revealed that cost–benefit analysis was applied in most studies, followed by multi-criteria analysis and other techniques. Hybrid adaptation strategies based on different combinations of hard, soft, and EbA interventions were considered as potential optimal solutions in a significant part of the assessments. This study shows some potential co-benefits of EbA, such as livelihood diversification or biodiversity conservation, but also stresses the need for further research on this topic, as well as on evaluating how EbA performs in the long term under changing climate-condition scenarios.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference92 articles.
1. Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A.T., Zimmermann, J., and Nicholls, R.J. (2015). Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding–A global assessment. PLoS ONE, 10. 2. Oppenheimer, M., Glavovic, B.C., Hinkel, J., van de Wal, R., Magnan, A.K., Abd-Elgawad, A., Cai, R., Cifuentes-Jara, M., DeConto, R.M., and Ghosh, T. (2019). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 3. Adaptation to climate change in coastal towns of between 10,000 and 50,000 inhabitants;Doust;Ocean. Coast. Manag.,2021 4. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 5. Hard or soft flood adaptation? Advantages of a hybrid strategy for Shanghai;Du;Glob. Environ. Change,2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|