Is It Safe Enough? An IPA Study of How Couple Therapists Make Sense of Their Decision to Either Stop or Continue with Couple Therapy When Violence Becomes the Issue

Author:

Snellingen Jan Frode1ORCID,Carlin Pål Erik1ORCID,Vetere Arlene2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Diaconia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, P.O. Box 184 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway

2. Faculty of Social Studies, VID Specialized University, P.O. Box 184 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Background: Couple therapists will encounter couple violence in their practice at some point. In this context, one of the main questions they must address is whether to continue with conjoint sessions. This study explores how couple therapists make sense of their decision whether or not to continue with conjoint sessions when violence has become an issue. Methods: This qualitative study used four semi-structured focus groups and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to analyse the data from the twelve experienced couple therapist participants. Results: Our IPA analysis led to three main group experiential themes across the focus groups: (1) Is it safe enough? (2) Do we have a joint and regenerative project? (3) Three key sources for sense making. Conclusion: Partner violence challenges the realm of couple therapy. This article explored how the couple therapists orient themselves and grapple with decision making when violence becomes an issue. The article offers unique insights regarding what the therapists orient themselves towards and how they try to form an impression of whether to continue conjoint sessions. We outline immediate clinical implications and propose measures for building individual and organisational capacity regarding “clinical sense making”. Suggestions for further research are also addressed.

Funder

East Regional Office for Children, Youth and Family Affairs (Bufetat Region Øst) and The Research Council of Norway

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference67 articles.

1. Visser, M., Van Lawick, J., Stith, S.M., and Spencer, C. (2020). Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling, Springer.

2. Andersson, T., Heimer, G., and Lucas, S. (2015). Violence and Health in Sweden: A National Prevalence Study on Exposure to Violence among Women and Men and Its Association to Health, National Centre for Knowledge on Men’s Violence Against Women (NCK).

3. Haaland, T., Clausen, S.-E., and Schei, B. (2005). Vold i Parforhold-Ulike Perspektiver: Resultater fra den Første Landsdekkende Undersøkelsen i Norge, Norsk Institutt for By- og regionforskning.

4. Smith, S.G., Basile, K.C., Gilbert, L.K., Merrick, M.T., Patel, N., Walling, M., and Jain, A. (2017). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 State Report.

5. Thoresen, S., and Hjemdal, O.K. (2014). Vold og Voldtekt i Norge. En Nasjonal Forekomststudie Av Vold I Et Livsløpsperspektiv Rapport, Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress A/S. Available online: https://nkvts.no/content/uploads/2015/11/vold_og_voldtekt_i_norge.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3