Affiliation:
1. School of Urban Construction, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2. School of Environment Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China
Abstract
Volumetric-based pricing for irrigation water was introduced as part of a comprehensive reform of agricultural water prices in China. However, operational deficiencies and farmers’ lack of willingness to adopt the volumetric pricing policy (VPP) hinder the coordinated implementation of the reform. To address these practical challenges, we employed a binary logistic regression model to analyse farmers’ acceptance of the VPP for agricultural irrigation water usage in Suqian City, Jiangsu Province. A variable set was formed by selecting potential variables from four types of influencing factors: the subject (water users), the object (water supply departments), natural condition factors, and social condition factors. Our results revealed seven factors that determine whether farmers accept the VPP: irrigation water measurement at the water inlet of a lateral canal, the irrigation water-saving rewards scale, enforcement efforts of charging by volume, the irrigation water source type, the use of agricultural water-saving for trade, financial investment in water-saving technology, and the level of irrigation water pricing. We determined the degree of influence of the seven determining factors, among which the irrigation water-saving rewards scale and enforcement efforts of charging by volume most influence farmers’ decisions on the VPP for irrigation water. The results of this study can be used as a reference for innovation of the agricultural water-saving system in Suqian City, optimisation of an accurate fiscal subsidy scale, quantification of irrigation water rights, optimisation of the measurement facility layout, and effective implementation of agricultural water rights trading. More broadly, this study provides a valuable reference for solving the difficulties faced in the comprehensive reform of agricultural water pricing in China, which includes irrigation water pricing mechanisms, management systems, subsidy mechanisms, and water-saving incentive measures.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Reference64 articles.
1. Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for Sustainable Development Goals implementation;Pastor;Nat. Commun.,2017
2. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China;Piao;Nature,2010
3. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2017). The Future of Food and Agriculture Trends and Challenges.
4. The challenge of irrigation water pricing in the Water Framework Directive;Albiac;Water Altern.,2020
5. Alexandratos, N., and Bruinsma, J. (2012). World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision, Global Perspective Studies Team. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division. ESA Working Paper No. 12-03.