Using a Low-Cost Sensor to Estimate Fine Particulate Matter: A Case Study in Samutprakarn, Thailand
-
Published:2024-03-08
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:336
-
ISSN:2073-4433
-
Container-title:Atmosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmosphere
Author:
Roddee Supichaya1, Changphuek Supachai1, Jirakajohnkool Supet1, Tochaiyaphum Panatda1, Phairuang Worradorn23ORCID, Chetiyanukornkul Thaneeya4, Boongla Yaowatat1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Sustainable Development Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rangsit Campus, Thammasat University, Pathumtani 12121, Thailand 2. Faculty of Geosciences and Civil Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 3. Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 4. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Abstract
This study evaluates low-cost sensors (LCSs) for measuring coarse and fine particulate matter (PM) to clarify and measure air pollution. LCSs monitored PM10, PM2.5 (fine particulates), and PM1.0 concentrations at four sites in Samutprakarn, Thailand from December 2021 to April 2022. Average daily PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 concentrations at the monitoring locations were 53–79, 34–45, and 31–43 μg/m3, respectively. In December 2021, the monitoring station had a daily PM2.5 value above 100 μg/m3, indicating haze occurrences. However, the monitoring site’s daily PM10 and PM1.0 concentrations did not surpass Thailand’s ambient air quality threshold. We also measured and calibrated comparative particulate matter concentrations from LCSs and a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) monitor (Pollution Control Department (PCD) standard analytical method). PM2.5 concentrations from the LCSs were lower than TEOM, but the difference was not statistically significant. The PM2.5 monitoring station provided near-real-time air quality data for health risk reduction, especially when PM levels were high. Based on this study, authorities and local agencies may consider improving air quality regulation in Samutprakan, focusing on suburban PM2.5 air pollution.
Reference68 articles.
1. Su, Y., Sofowote, U., Debosz, J., White, L., and Munoz, A. (2018). Multi-year continuous PM2.5 measurements with the federal equivalent method SHARP 5030 and comparisons to filter-based and TEOM measurements in Ontario, Canada. Atmosphere, 9. 2. Preliminary monitoring of concentration of particulate matter (PM2.5) in seven townships of Yangon City, Myanmar;Yi;Environ. Health Prev. Med.,2018 3. Kirešová, S., Guzan, M., and Sobota, B. (2023). Using low-cost sensors for measuring and monitoring particulate matter with a focus on fine and ultrafine particles. Atmosphere, 14. 4. Zhang, T., Su, Y., Debosz, J., Michael, N., Noble, M., Munoz, A., and Xu, X. (2022). Continuous measurements and source apportionment of ambient PM2.5-bound elements in Windsor, Canada. Atmosphere, 13. 5. Mukherjee, A., Brown, S.G., McCarthy, M.C., Pavlovic, N.R., Stanton, L.G., Snyder, J.L., D’Andrea, S.D., and Hafner, H.R. (2019). Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost. Sensors, 19.
|
|